• Type:
  • Genre:
  • Duration:
  • Average Rating:

Dennis Burger

Review: Tales of the Jedi

Logo
Tales of the Jedi (2022)

review | Tales of the Jedi

ALSO ON CINELUXE

Sign up for our monthly newsletter
to stay up to date on Cineluxe

This Disney+ animated series proves you can still tell a family-friendly Star Wars tale that has real emotional depth

by Dennis Burger
October 27, 2022

For the better part of 15 years I’ve been begging anyone who would listen to give Dave Filoni’s brilliant animated series The Clone Wars the chance it deserves. But even the most devoted Star Wars fans in my life have largely written the series off, either due to the fact that it’s animated or that the first season is an uneven slog. No amount of pleading has convinced most of them that by the third season it starts to become some of the best television ever made. 

If nothing else, the new Tales of the Jedi lowers the barrier to entry into Filoni’s CG take on this beloved mythology, and if that’s all it accomplished it would be a stunning success. At just over 95 minutes split across six short films ranging from 12 to 19 minutes each, this anthology series is an easily digestible snapshot that demonstrates why the writer and executive producer is such a gifted storyteller.

But it’s actually much more than that. Breaking from the serialized storytelling tradition of The Clone Wars, The Bad Batch, and Rebels before it, Tales of the Jedi is a collection of parables focused more on tonal and thematic through-lines than narrative ones. It’s a study in contrasts, an exploration of right and wrong, dark and light, strength and weakness. It explores what happens when ideology comes into conflict with principles, when rhetoric doesn’t match reality, and how circumstances out of our control mold us as humans—but it also underlines our responsibility to avoid blaming circumstance. 

The visual style will be familiar to anyone who has followed Clone Wars and Bad Batch, but it’s a further evolution thereof. What started as an homage to Supermarionation in CGI form has grown into a style of its own. Dolby Vision is employed here to paint with light and shadow, almost as a sort of literal manifestation of the series’ emotional themes. But it’s never showy. 

Take the first episode, for example, which takes place in the small village where Ahsoka Tano (one of two characters at the center of these interwoven parables) was born. As her mother emerges from their hut, the HDR is used to force the viewer’s eye to react to the transition from interior to exterior at exactly the same time as the characters. It’s almost a form of forced empathy, and if it didn’t work it would be just a gimmick, but it works. 

I’m almost inclined to describe the imagery on the whole more in terms of cinematography than composition. There were a couple of times I found myself trying to figure out what lenses were used in certain shots, which is ridiculous, of course. The series was rendered, not shot. But it’s easy to forget that at times—not because the animation is or attempts to be hyper-realistic but rather because it’s consistent and artful enough to make you buy into this highly stylized reality. 

The Dolby Atmos mix functions similarly, not wowing you for the sake of wow but rather enhancing the environments and moods. Height-channel effects tend to be more ambient—at least as far as I noticed. At some point, I just stopped thinking about the sound mix altogether, which is how I like them.

I will say this about the sound, though: Composer Kevin Kiner returned to do the score for Tales of the Jedi but I found his music for this one almost unrecognizable. He has crafted a musical soundscape that somehow finds common ground with Vangelis and Philip Glass alike without aping the style of either. It’s frankly some of his best work to date. I keep saying that, I know, but he keeps getting better.

You’ll no doubt hear quite a bit about how Liam Neeson teamed up with his son, Micheál Richardson, to voice Qui-Gon Jinn at different stages in his life in the middle installments of this short series. You’ll also likely hear about Bryce Dallas Howard’s participation. I guess that’s the sort of thing marketing teams and PR companies focus on these days, but Tales of the Jedi doesn’t succeed or fail based on who voiced whom or which character secrets are revealed.

As I write this, Andor is in the middle of proving that you can craft an adult Star Wars story without pandering to Gen-X nostalgia or devolving into grimdark edginess. Tales of the Jedi proves you can still tell genuinely family-friendly stories in that galaxy far, far away, with rich emotional depth, deeply resonant themes, and without making every aspect of the story a callback to one that’s already been told.

Whether you’re seven or 77, whether you’ve seen every Star Wars cartoon ever made or you just barely know the difference between a lightsaber and landspeeder, there’s something here for you. And if this is what it takes to convince you to get off your butt and finally watch The Clone Wars, all the better.

Dennis Burger is an avid Star Wars scholar, Tolkien fanatic, and Corvette enthusiast who somehow also manages to find time for technological passions including high-end audio, home automation, and video gaming. He lives in the armpit of Alabama with his wife Bethany and their four-legged child Bruno, a 75-pound American Staffordshire Terrier who thinks he’s a Pomeranian.

PICTURE | Dolby Vision is employed to paint with light and shadow, almost as a sort of literal manifestation of the series’ emotional themes, but it’s never showy 

SOUND | The Atmos mix doesn’t wow you for the sake of wow but rather enhances the environments and moods, with the height-channel effects tending to be more ambient

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

© 2023 Cineluxe LLC

Let’s Talk to Josh

LET’S TALK TO JOSH

CEO Alex Capecelatro discusses how Josh AI provides a level of voice control Google and Amazon can’t match—and without any of the snooping

by Dennis Burger
October 21, 2022

The explosion of voice control over the past few years has changed the way people interact with their lights and locks and entertainment systems. But all of this comes at a cost—mainly, legitimate privacy concerns. There is a luxury alternative to the Alexas and Siris and OK Googles of the world, however, known as Josh AI—or simply Josh—that allows you to talk to your Control 4, Crestron, or Lutron control system

Alex Capecelatro

Alex Capecelatro

as an alternative to using touchscreens, keypads, or wand-style remotes—and without the risk of violating your privacy. In the conversation  below, CEO Alex Capecelatro talks about Josh’s approach to privacy, customization, and the unique needs of the custom luxury market.

Amazon has done a pretty good job of selling voice control to the masses but it doesn’t seem to have moved the needle as much with high-end custom homes. Why do you think that is?

Amazon doesn’t really care about the problems and situations we deal with in catering to the luxury market. They’re just trying to get millions upon millions of listening devices into people’s homes. So while it’s good that they’ve moved people towards acceptance of voice control, it also presents this opportunity where people are saying, “I see the benefits but I also see the concerns.” And that’s a dilemma we can speak to. You don’t have to give up your privacy just to have good voice control.

Also, Amazon’s approach relies more on mapping simple commands to simple actions. For example, Alexa can create a scene that controls your lights but if you want to be able to walk into

The Josh mobile interface lets you talk to your system from poolside or the other side of the world

Let's Talk to Josh

The Josh mobile interface lets you talk to your system from poolside or the other side of the world

any room and say “Turn it up”—something like that is room-dependent, device-dependent. Josh, by contrast, understands what’s going on with the state of the home so the homeowner can speak very naturally.

This isn’t as much of a problem when you’re dealing with a single-bedroom apartment or a smaller-footprint home. But when you’re getting into 5,000-to-10,000-square-foot homes or larger, it’s going to make a difference because in homes like that, you can have hundreds of connected devices across dozens of rooms.

I assume data privacy is also a big part of the appeal of your system for a high-end clientele. 

Exactly. We don’t upload your voice to the cloud unless we need to. We don’t believe it’s actually required, and it’s not the right thing to do except in very specific cases.

With Amazon, they do practically no processing on the device itself. They’re sending everything out to the cloud. When you do that, it’s very tempting to start using that information to serve up ads and other things. And we see it when Amazon files patents. They’re building passive listening devices that are monitoring what you say even if they’re not invoked, and specifically listening for words like “vacation” or “Florida” so then it knows to serve you ads for airlines and stuff.

I was always under the impression all of the processing for Josh was done locally, but looking at your FAQ, I see that Josh does require minimal access to the Josh Cloud. Is that a new development?

No, we’ve always had that. Reason being, if you want to be able to connect to cloud services—streaming music from Spotify, for example, or streaming video from Netflix—that has to go out to the cloud. If you want to be able to ask questions like, “What’s the weather forecast?” you’re

Let's Talk to Josh

the Josh Micro voice-control module

the Josh Micro voice-control module

hitting a weather API that’s going to be out in the cloud. The local processing is simply not going to be able to know or access all of that. 

That said, the way our hardware in the home communicates with the Josh Cloud is very similar to the way banking-app encryption works so it’s very secure. It’s just to a trusted endpoint; it’s not going out to any third parties that aren’t controlled by us.

You were talking earlier about what “Turn it up” might mean on a room-by-room basis. Is that adaptability—the ability to have a command mean something different in one room from another—based on programming done by the installer or is that machine learning?

That’s using a few different technologies. Basically, it’s looking at a mapping of the home, what devices are in the rooms, and what capabilities those devices have, in addition to what things have been recently asked for. So when you walk into the living room and say, “Turn it up,” Josh knows the living room has three devices capable of being turned up.

That could refer to the volume of music, the temperature on the thermostat, or the brightness of the lights. Josh says to itself, “Which of these devices are currently running and have the ability to be turned up?” So if there’s music playing and nothing else is active, “Turn it up” is almost certainly referring to the music volume. On the other hand, if there’s no music playing but you have a thermostat connected to an HVAC zone currently engaged in heating, “Turn it up” is likely going to refer to the temperature.

Josh is constantly looking at the context of the environment you’re in, which involves retaining the context of your recent commands. The system understands the context of the way we naturally speak. 

Do you have Josh users who are uncomfortable that the system analyzes how they use different devices and systems throughout the home and over time and retains that information? 

Yes. There’s a lot of value to keeping a history of commands, in that you might want to know why the fireplace was on or why the music was playing in a certain room. Maybe it’s because the kids gave it a command. But some people would rather have the utmost privacy, where there’s no history or logging, and so we give the ability to put Josh into incognito mode where you give a command, the action happens, but it never gets written to a database, even on your local hardware.

We also thought about the middle ground. What about someone who wants to be able to see what the microphones heard last night that made their music start playing at bedtime but maybe they don’t care about a week ago because that’s old news? We allow the homeowner to set up a trigger that automatically deletes their history every day, week, or month. So that effectively allows you to say, “Hey, keep my command logs for as long as they’re useful to me, but don’t keep them forever.”

Do the settings that let a user delete their command history affect the system’s ability to adapt to their habits or preferences? Or is that just an irrelevant question?

It’s relevant, but it’s something that matters less when you have a professional installer because there are a lot of things you can program into the system. For example, an integrator can program it such that when the client says, “Play some music,” if it’s in the morning it plays classical and if it’s in the evening it plays jazz, or whatever genres might match the homeowner’s preferences throughout the day to set the right mood.

That being said, if you don’t have your commands being erased and you haven’t specified what you want it to do, when you walk into a room and ask it to simply “Play music,” Josh has the ability to look

the Nano embedded in a Lutron wall plate with the privacy switch visible near the bottom of the microphone

Let's Talk to Josh

the Nano embedded in a Lutron wall plate with the privacy switch visible near the bottom of the microphone

Sign up for our monthly newsletter
to stay up to date on Cineluxe

at what music you’ve historically asked for at any given time of the day and pick something it thinks is appropriate. If you are deleting your logs, though, we’re not going to be able to do those types of things without some extra programming ahead of time.

Let’s talk about the privacy switch on the Josh Nano. It’s a little switch that turns red when you flip it off, giving the user more confidence that the system is indeed unable to listen to them. How did that come about?

There are a number of microphone devices out there that have the ability to mute but typically it’s a software-controlled mute, and I remember hearing people saying in the early days of the Amazon Echo that they didn’t trust its mute function. Did it really disable the microphone? Is it really not listening or is it just turning on a red light that makes you think it’s not listening? I’m not sure.

When you flip that switch on the Josh Nano, though, we physically disconnect the microphone. There’s a physical connection that’s broken. There’s no way that device could be listening to you. 

Also, on a lot of other devices from mass-market companies, the mute is on the back or on the bottom or somewhere that’s hard to see. We decided to make it the only physical switch on the face of the product, so when you approach it and see that one switch, it’s super easy to know what it does. 

Dennis Burger is an avid Star Wars scholar, Tolkien fanatic, and Corvette enthusiast who somehow also manages to find time for technological passions including high-end audio, home automation, and video gaming. He lives in the armpit of Alabama with his wife Bethany and their four-legged child Bruno, a 75-pound American Staffordshire Terrier who thinks he’s a Pomeranian.

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

© 2023 Cineluxe LLC

Review: Muppets Haunted Mansion

Muppets Haunted Mansion (2019)

review | Muppets Haunted Mansion

related reviews

Sign up for our monthly newsletter
to stay up to date on Cineluxe

Another uneven offering from the Muppets—entertaining enough, but it could have been a lot better

by Dennis Burger
October 8, 2021

The Germans, in all their linguistic inventiveness, need to coin a new word for the unique mix of eagerness and hesitation that Jim Henson fans feel when a new Muppets project is announced. The simple fact is the Disney era of the franchise has been a roller coaster, reaching heights of delightful silliness like 2011’s The Muppets and plunging to depths of pointlessness like 2005’s The Muppets’ Wizard of Oz. Thankfully, Muppets Haunted Mansion is far from the worst we’ve seen from the franchise this century, but it is a bit of a mixed bag.

Let’s start off with what doesn’t work about the hour-long Halloween special. For one thing, it all feels a bit formulaic in its structure and narrative. You could argue that’s a consequence of the premise, and you’d have a pretty good point. But I still miss the days when the Muppets were so utterly off the rails that you felt uncomfortable watching a new movie or TV show with kids, at least the first time around, for fear Animal or Floyd might drop an F-bomb. Not that they ever would, but the Muppets at their best once gave you the impression they might. And Muppets Haunted Mansion feels far too safe and by-the-numbers to even hint at such a possibility. 

There’s also the fact that some of the voice acting is just atrocious. This is the first major Muppets production since Steve Whitmire, longtime performer of Kermit the Frog, was fired and replaced by Matt Vogel (and yes, yes, I know about Muppets Now, but I’ve never been able to suffer through enough of it for it to leave a lasting impression). And no disrespect to Mr. Vogel—he does a perfectly fine Floyd and a darned good Sweetums—but he’s not and never will be Kermit. He just doesn’t get the character.

A problem more specific to this special is that the music is, for the most part, awful. There are a handful of original songs, and every time I could sense another one coming, my body tensed up in anticipation of the awfulness. There are two exceptions, though. The special opens and closes with a cover of King Harvest’s version of “Dancing in the Moonlight” performed by Dr. Teeth and the Electric Mayhem. It’s simply fantastic and there’s really nothing else to say about it. It rocks. 

There’s also a really fun duet between Pepe the King Prawn and Taraji P. Henson, who stars as Constance Hatchaway (aka the Black Widow Bride from the theme park ride that inspired this crossover). Not only is the song well written and well performed, it also hints at the naughtiness of the Muppets at their best. 

But the best thing about the number is that it’s just a prime example of Pepe being Pepe. Seriously, every second that fuzzy little king prawn is on screen is pure comedy gold. It probably helps, that longtime Pepe performer Bill Barretta wrote the story for Muppets Haunted Mansion, and I could take issue with the fact that he gave all the best bits to his own character, but who cares, really? If you’re a Pepe fan, this one is a must-watch, even if it is a bit uneven, even if the music mostly sucks, even if Kermit has been replaced by a half-assed imposter. 

Another great thing about Muppets Haunted Mansion is that production values are through the roof. The special boasts a level of cinematography and special effects you’d expect from a proper feature film. Disney+’s Dolby Vision presentation is also so flawless that I was, at times, startled. The opening sequence, for example, features a particularly difficult-to-encode shot of Pepe and Gonzo driving to the haunted mansion in the midst of the sort of pea-soup fog HEVC would have nightmares about if video codecs had a subconscious. And while that shot is the most extreme example, there are a lot of sequences throughout that must have required a few passes through whatever video encoder Disney+ relies on. Unsurprisingly, given the subject matter, Haunted Mansion sports some pretty dark cinematography, and the Dolby Vision grading gives the imagery a lot of depth in the shadows while also leaving some dynamic range for the specular highlights of spectral apparitions. 

Production- and presentation-wise, the only complaints I have are related to the audio, which lacks a little in terms of dynamics and could have benefited from a bit more activity in the surrounds, or at least a bit more consistency in the surround mixing. Dialogue is always presented cleanly and clearly, and the music—whatever you want to say about its compositional quality—is always delivered with good fidelity. But whoever did the final mix for the special seemingly couldn’t decide between a full-on cinematic surround experience or a front-heavy TV-special vibe, and switched between those two extremes from scene to scene with apparently no rhyme or reason. 

For all the nits picked above, though, Muppets Haunted Mansion ends up being a pretty good time, mostly due to the antics of Pepe combined with the gorgeousness of the imagery. If you have kids, I’m also pretty sure they’ll love the whole thing. And that is the thing I like best about this special. Fun Halloween specials that can be enjoyed by the whole family are few and far between and it’s nice to see another one added to the mix, even if it’s not quite as good as it could have been.

Dennis Burger is an avid Star Wars scholar, Tolkien fanatic, and Corvette enthusiast who somehow also manages to find time for technological passions including high-end audio, home automation, and video gaming. He lives in the armpit of Alabama with his wife Bethany and their four-legged child Bruno, a 75-pound American Staffordshire Terrier who thinks he’s a Pomeranian.

PICTURE | The Dolby Vision presentation is so flawless it can be, at times, startling

SOUND | The audio lacks a little in terms of dynamics and could have benefited from a bit more activity in the surrounds

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

© 2023 Cineluxe LLC

Review: Midsommar

Midsommar (2019)

review | Midsommar

This arthouse horror film eschews jump scares and plot twists for atmosphere and style

by Dennis Burger
October 14, 2020

One relatively recent trend that warms my dark heart is the reemergence of horror as a legitimate genre of cinema. This isn’t to say that I don’t get a kick out of schlocky B-movie suspense but for most of my adult life, horror movies have been little more than that, leaving legitimate attempts at making serious films in the genre—like Rosemary’s Baby and Kubrick’s The Shining—in the distant past. So to see Jordan Peele’s Get Out, Darren Aronofsky’s Mother!, and Ari Aster’s Hereditary embraced in recent years as art is, if nothing else, a step in the right direction.

Aster’s follow-up to Hereditary, 2019’s Midsommar, keeps the horror-as-art train rolling, not simply due to its gorgeous cinematography, deep reliance on symbolism, or its 148-minute run time, but because it actually has something to say. While Peele used horror for the purposes of societal allegory in Get Out and Aster himself used it to explore familial angst in Hereditary, Midsommar broadens its reach to explore both cultural issues and deeply personal struggles. And it’s the constant tug-of-war between the individual on the one hand and the expectations of the herd on the other that give the film so much of its tension. 

That’s simply one element of what makes the film work, though. In telling the tale of a group of anthropology students (and the girlfriend of one of them, herself a psychology student) as they travel to Sweden to study and document the cultural traditions of an isolated Scandinavian commune, Aster uses personal relationships the way Kubrick used architecture in The Shining. In other words, if you’re paying attention, there’s an internal consistency to it all that’s nonetheless contradictory, which results in a foreboding sense of unease. 

That in itself wouldn’t be worthy of praise but it’s the way Aster and cinematographer Pawel Pogorzelski convey the ties that bind (and the wedges that divide) the characters that makes Midsommar so fascinating. In one early scene, for example, the film uses mirrors brilliantly to convey a sense of othering. The characters viewed directly by the camera? They are the “Us.” Those that can only be seen in reflection? They fall (or move) into “Them” territory. And what’s fascinating here is that the film’s “Us” and “Them” are right opposite of the audience’s “Us” and “Them,” which further builds tension. 

What I appreciate most is that such compositional sleight of hand is almost always employed with such subtlety that it never comes across as a gimmick. Only one scene crosses the line into artsy-for-arty’s-sake territory, and it’s an establishing shot, demarking the transition from one culture into the other, so it’s easily forgiven. 

That scene is far from the only one that could be construed as cinema-for-cinema’s sake. So much of Midsommar is pure audiovisual experience—style as substance, if you will—intended to invoke feeling rather than trigger thought. Perhaps my favorite thing about the film is that it strikes such a perfect balance in alternating between storytelling and tone poetry that it’s nearly two-and-a-half-hour runtime never becomes a slog. 

That’s aided by the fact that it never resorts to jump-scares or twists to keep you hanging on. It telegraphs exactly the direction in which it’s heading and then takes its time getting there, which only adds to the suspense and tension. 

The one big surprise—at least for me—is that Midsommar wasn’t shot on film, but rather captured in a combination of 8K and 4K, and finished in a 4K digital intermediate. Despite this, it boasts a very film-like aesthetic, although the palette is intentionally muted. And Kaleidescape’s 4K HDR presentation is wonderfully true to Midsommar‘s intended look, delivering it with exceptional detail. Far more importantly, the Kaleidescape download doesn’t muck up the background textures the way streaming providers do. Perhaps it’s a result of the resolution at which the movie was shot, but Apple TV’s stream in particular suffers from occasionally messy and noisy textures that serve as a bit of a distraction, whereas the Kaleidescape download maintains its composure from beginning to end, even when the film is at its densest, visually speaking. 

The high dynamic range does little to change the look of the film overall, largely due to that muted palette. When HDR does make itself known, it’s generally in the shadows, especially during those scenes in which a darkened interior is viewed from a sunlit exterior. HDR allows the viewer to see into those shadows without brightening the image as a whole. 

Kaleidescape’s DTS-HD Master Audio 5.1 soundtrack is also true to the film’s theatrical audio mix. You may have seen Midsommar presented in Dolby Atmos on certain streaming platforms, but these Atmos tracks were created using Nugen Audio’s Halo upmixer software, based on the original 5.1. Given my druthers, I’ll take the original mix, thank you very much. It’s unusually aggressive, in a way I normally don’t love, but in this case it absolutely works. 

The soundtrack leans on the surround channels hard, often panning dialogue into them so fully that if your rear speakers aren’t up to the quality of the rest of your system, you’ll likely hear a shift in the quality of the sound. Even if your system is well-designed from front to back, it’s still a disorienting and frankly distracting effect. But that’s the point. The mix rarely goes whole-hog on the surrounds when there’s something crucial happening onscreen. And when it does, it’s because the film wants to you feel disoriented at that moment. 

The only thing missing from Kaleidescape’s download is Aster’s original 171-minute cut, which A24, the film’s distributor, made him trim down for wide theatrical release. Given that the cuts were made simply to cram more butts into seats and not due to content, it’s strange that A24 is so precious with the original edit. In the US, the only ways to see it are via Apple TV (it’s included as an iTunes Extra with the purchase of the film) and by way of an incredibly limited 4K Blu-ray release that’s already fetching six times its original asking price on the secondary market. 

What I wouldn’t give to view that cut of the film in the quality of Kaleidescape’s presentation. Despite its nearly three-hour length, the director’s cut is even better paced and frankly feels like a shorter film. But the improvements over the theatrical cut aren’t so substantial that I would choose Apple TV’s compromised stream over Kaleidescape’s pixel-perfect download.

Dennis Burger is an avid Star Wars scholar, Tolkien fanatic, and Corvette enthusiast who somehow also manages to find time for technological passions including high-end audio, home automation, and video gaming. He lives in the armpit of Alabama with his wife Bethany and their four-legged child Bruno, a 75-pound American Staffordshire Terrier who thinks he’s a Pomeranian.

PICTURE | Kaleidescape’s 4K HDR presentation is wonderfully true to Midsommar‘s intended look, delivering it with exceptional detail

SOUND | The DTS-HD Master Audio 5.1 soundtrack is unusually aggressive but true to the film’s theatrical mix, leaning hard on the surrounds

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

© 2023 Cineluxe LLC

Review: Stranger Things 3

Stranger Things 3 (2019)

review | Stranger Things 3

related reviews

Sign up for our monthly newsletter
to stay up to date on Cineluxe

Season 3 goes for the gruesome, balancing the horror by taking the series’ first stab at zany

by Dennis Burger
July 8, 2019

Stranger Things 3 is such a tonal, structural, and narrative departure from what’s come before that it can take hardcore fans of the series (raises hand unapologetically) a few episodes to get into this year’s batch of eight episodes. That’s not to say there’s anything wrong with the first couple episodes. In fact, the show’s creators—collectively known as the Duffer Brothers—demonstrate time and again their ability to lovingly mash up, remix, riff on, and reassemble 1980s pop culture in new and inventive ways. It’s simply that this time around, they’re being a little cheeky about it. 

There’s a poolside scene in the first episode, for example, in which they nab the Cars’ “Moving in Stereo” from Fast Times at Ridgemont High, and it’s played in such a way that you can’t help but anticipate exactly what’s coming if you know that film. That anticipation is hilariously subverted, though, setting the stage for a new season that is, at times, something Stranger Things has never really been before: Zany.

Get a few episodes in to Stranger Things 3 and the reason for this starts to become clear. While leaning hard on all the influences that have made the show so beloved to date—Stephen King, Steven Spielberg, Robert Zemeckis, Richard Donner, Joe Dante, Tobe Hooper, Rob Reiner, and all the other giants of genre and coming-of-age fiction from that era—the Duffers also start to bring other, darker influences to the forefront, like early-’80s Sam Raimi and mid-80s David Cronenberg. As such, things can get a little more gruesome this time around.

To balance that, the creators introduce a lot more levity. They’ve mentioned Fletch as a big inspiration for Stranger Things 3, and indeed, elements of the Chevy Chase screwball comedy can be seen in the side-quest of Hopper (the show’s irritable chief of police) and Joyce (the mother of Mike, the unfortunate victim of Stranger Things and Stranger Things 2). 

Add to that some unlikely influences such as Spies Like Us and Red Dawn (the latter of which is ribbed more than revered here), and you’ve got a weird and wonderful pastiche that, on paper at least, seems like it would struggle to hold itself together. But hold together it does. Whether it’s tweaking mall culture, reliving the Cold War tensions between the U.S. and U.S.S.R, or once again bringing a Dungeons & Dragons campaign to life in the creepiest of ways, Stranger Things 3 succeeds primarily because it’s not merely a gimmicky nostalgia romp—it’s a legitimate love letter to a bygone era. 

As a result of that, some of its tropes may feel a little dated. The show isn’t interested in shades of grey: There are good guys and there are bad guys. And the bad guys are bad because they’re dirty commies hellbent on world destruction or something. Why are they hellbent on world destruction or something? Because they’re the bad guys. Duh. 

But none of the above matters so much as the show’s amazing cast, which features a few new additions this year. Cary Elwes positively chews the scenery as the corrupt mayor of Hawkins, Indiana, whose shady political dealings allowed for the construction of the Russian-financed mall that serves as a front for the nefarious Soviet experiment at the heart of this season. And Maya Hawke (daughter of Uma Thurman and Ethan Hawke) absolutely shines as the misfit mall employee who helps crack the case at the heart of Stranger Things 3. But the original cast, including the impossibly talented Millie Bobby Brown, is still the emotional heart of the show, and it’s their relationships, their emotional ups and downs, their successes and failures that keep us coming back.

Another thing that makes Stranger Things 3 such a fun and effective followup to the first two is that, despite all of its shake-ups in terms of tone, structure, and inspiration, there’s an undeniable through-line in the look of the show. The aesthetic is, unsurprisingly, 1980s through and through, and while capturing that look doesn’t leave a lot of room for super-vivid imagery, the 4K presentation relies heavily on HDR to add depth and texture to the shadows. There’s some nice use of spectacular (though not really eye-reactive) highlights from time to time, but most of the dynamic range is reserved for the lower end of the value scale. As such, you’ll definitely benefit from watching on a display that can handle the distinction between black and oh-so-very-nearly black. 

The 5.1-channel soundtrack also deserves to be experienced on the highest-quality surround sound system possible. That shouldn’t be a surprise, given that Stranger Things 2 was the impetus behind Netflix’s new adaptive studio-quality sound technology. Still, it’s a little shocking just how effective—indeed, aggressive—the mix is this time around. I don’t think my subwoofer has gotten such a raucous workout since Scott Pilgrim vs. the World, and the surround channels are pushed to their extremes in all the right places, especially in remixing the gloriously nostalgic soundtrack.

My only beef is that Netflix doesn’t give us any bonus features for Stranger Things 3. While another season of Beyond Stranger Things would have been ideal, any sort of extra goodies would have been appreciated. 

Thankfully, the show stands on its own as a binge-worthy romp, especially for those of us who grew up in the era being mythologized. And for what it’s worth, there’s one tiny extra worth mentioning: If you’re the type to hit the stop button as soon as the ending credits start rolling, be sure to stick around past the end of the final episode. There’s a mid-credits sequence that sets the stage for Stranger Things 4, which by all accounts will likely be the show’s swan song.

Dennis Burger is an avid Star Wars scholar, Tolkien fanatic, and Corvette enthusiast who somehow also manages to find time for technological passions including high-end audio, home automation, and video gaming. He lives in the armpit of Alabama with his wife Bethany and their four-legged child Bruno, a 75-pound American Staffordshire Terrier who thinks he’s a Pomeranian.

PICTURE | Capturing the look of the 1980s doesn’t leave a lot of room for super-vivid imagery, so the 4K presentation relies heavily on HDR to add depth and texture to the shadows 

SOUND | It’s a little shocking just how  aggressive the mix is this time around. The surround channels are pushed to their extremes in all the right places, especially in remixing the gloriously nostalgic soundtrack.

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

© 2023 Cineluxe LLC

Review: The Nightmare Before Christmas

The Nightmare Before Christmas (1993)

review | The Nightmare Before Christmas

ALSO ON CINELUXE

Sign up for our monthly newsletter
to stay up to date on Cineluxe

This Tim Burton classic would seem like it would benefit from a 4K HDR upgrade but turns out to be almost flawless when seen in HD on Disney+

by Dennis Burger
December 22, 2020

In retrospect, it’s kind of amazing that The Nightmare Before Christmas works at all. The film, after all, wasn’t really based on a story so much as it was cobbled together from some poetry and sketches and ideas from Tim Burton, who intended to turn it into a half-hour TV special à la Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer, or maybe a children’s book, or maybe something else altogether. There’s also the fact that the screenplay by Caroline Thompson ended up serving almost more as a skeleton for the film than an actual script, given that much of the final product was developed visually by director Henry Selick and was constantly in flux. 

If anyone deserves the utmost praise for the success of The Nightmare Before Christmas, it would be Danny Elfman, who worked with Burton to flesh out something resembling the major story beats then wrote the soundtrack that, in the end, actually serves as the story rather than merely as accompaniment. So much so that Chris Sarandon, who was cast in the role of the speaking voice of Jack Skellington was left with very little to do. Elfman ends up being the primary voice of Jack, the spirit of Jack, and the driving force for the film, while Selick filters Burton’s aesthetic through his own similar style and every other aspect of the production just gets dragged along for the ride.

It ought to be a mess, and yet Nightmare remains one of the most charming and heartfelt holiday films I’ve ever seen. And, yes, it would be more accurate to call Nightmare a “holiday” film than a Christmas film because although it appropriates all the trappings of our modern commercialized, paganized melting-pot celebration of the nativity, the story makes it abundantly clear the trappings of Christmas are hardly the point.

Instead, Nightmare cuts to the heart of why this time of year has been the center of celebration for millennia, from Saturnalia to Yule to Hanukkah to Ayyappan to Calan Gaeaf to Yaldā Night to Christmas and so many other holy and secular holidays that I’m forgetting at the moment. It’s a recognition of the fact that this holiday season represents the return of the light after a period of encroaching darkness beginning around the harvest/Halloween/Samhain/Día de los Muertos. It goes straight to the cyclical and seasonal reasons for these festivals far too many of us have forgotten, living as we do indoors and disconnected from the earth. 

There’s also a thematic aspect of Nightmare that resonates outside of its connection to the holiday season, and it’s a theme few storytellers have explored so effectively. (Really, only Tolkien comes to mind, most notably with the story of Míriel from the Quenta Silmarillion and Morgoth’s Ring.) It’s the simple lesson that when we attempt to be who we are not, to defy our true nature, nothing good can possibly come of it. In attempting to assume the role of “Sandy Claws” merely as a means of rejecting or pacifying his own dissatisfaction with the doom and gloom of Halloween without truly understanding why or how people celebrate Christmas, Jack makes a mess of pretty much everything. And while the resolution of this story thread is all wrapped up a little too tidily, what more do you expect from a 76-minute cartoon? 

Any fan of the film probably already realizes all of the above, though, so why am I going on about it all? Because the original premise of this review fell out from under me. I had every intention of writing a scathing (and perhaps pleading) criticism about the fact that The Nightmare Before Christmas deserves a 4K HDR remaster more than just about any of the Disney animated films that have already received such. 

But when I sat down to watch the film again—mostly to take notes on all the scenes I thought would be improved by a modern home video transfer—I realized the current HD master (which has been with us since 2008) is pretty much flawless. Fans revolted when Disney dropped a 25th-anniversary re-release on the marketplace in 2018 with nothing more than a new singalong mode and a bit of extra bandwidth for the film itself. And I was right there, pitchfork raised alongside theirs.

But even the HD version of the film on Disney+ looks flawless. The limited color palette is presented perfectly. Blacks are richer than liquid gold and there’s nary a hint of crush to be found. Highlights don’t clip, midtones don’t seem in any way lacking in subtlety, and the level of detail is incredible. Simply put, all the shortcomings we now associate with HD video are pretty much nowhere to be seen. I think I’ve seen Nightmare on the big screen at least 10 times, and frankly even the Disney+ stream looks better than any of those commercial exhibitions, revealing fine textures and little visual Easter eggs I didn’t even notice in IMAX from the fourth row. 

Granted, the Disney+ version doesn’t include all the supplemental material that has appeared on various home video releases through the years. It does include several deleted scenes and storyboards, along with a few other goodies. But it lacks a couple of essential gems, namely the audio commentary by Selick, Burton, and Elfman, as well as Christopher Lee’s reading of Burton’s original “Nightmare Before Christmas” poem. You can find those on Kaleidescape, though, and they’re all worth a watch/listen.

More than anything, though, I wanted to point out that if you’ve been waiting on a UHD release of The Nightmare Before Christmas, you should probably stop. If it were going to happen anytime soon, it would have been two years ago. Given Disney’s penchant for tying home video releases to anniversaries, our next shot at a remaster probably comes in 2023. And that’s too long to wait before diving into this charming little holiday gem again.

Dennis Burger is an avid Star Wars scholar, Tolkien fanatic, and Corvette enthusiast who somehow also manages to find time for technological passions including high-end audio, home automation, and video gaming. He lives in the armpit of Alabama with his wife Bethany and their four-legged child Bruno, a 75-pound American Staffordshire Terrier who thinks he’s a Pomeranian.

PICTURE | The HD version on Disney+ looks flawless. The limited color palette is presented perfectly, with the blacks richer than liquid gold and with nary a hint of crush to be found.

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

© 2023 Cineluxe LLC

Review: It (2017)

It (2017)

review | It (2017)

related reviews

Sign up for our monthly newsletter
to stay up to date on Cineluxe

This adaptation of the Stephen King novel is a major reworking of the source material but that yields big dividends in its relevance, themes, and atmosphere 

by Dennis Burger
October 20, 2020

Had I known going in just how drastically Andy Muschietti restructured Stephen King’s It when adapting the 1,138-page novel into two movies, I probably never would have given it a chance. In case you’re not familiar with the book, it follows the adventures and tribulations of seven friends known collectively as “The Loser’s Club,” cutting back and forth between their adolescent and adult encounters with a shapeshifting, homicidal cosmic horror who takes the form of a clown known as Pennywise. 

The intercutting between the characters as adults and adolescents is crucial to the plot (not to mention the emotional impact) of the novel, so if you had told me ahead of time that Muschietti shuffled the story like a deck of cards, then laid out the events in chronological order, with the first movie focusing on the story of the Loser’s Club as kids and the second serving as a sequel focusing on their adult experiences, I would have explained to you (probably with as much condescension as I could humanly muster) that such an approach would miss the point of the book entirely.

And although that may be the case, what Muschietti has done is turn this story into two distinct stories, each with its own themes, and each of which—much to my pleasant surprise—works as its own self-contained experience, with a proper beginning, middle, and ending. 

The other big change Muschietti and screenwriter Gary Dauberman made to the source material was an update to the timeline. Rather than starting in 1957, as does the book, It moves the Loser’s Club’s youth to 1989, and also adds a couple of years to their ages. The former change not only allows the cinematic sequel to take place in the present day, but also allows Muschietti to rely on cultural references that will likely be a bit more familiar to modern audiences. The latter change keeps the film from veering too far into exploitative territory and also makes the story somewhat more believable. 

Muschietti and Dauberman also removed some of the cosmic/spiritual aspects of the story that strain credulity to its breaking point, and what we’re left with is a movie that, in many ways, sort of feels like a scary, R-rated riff on The Goonies. There are also shades of Stranger Things here and there (and not merely because Finn Wolfhard, that series’ star, plays a key role in the film). 

Despite the comparisons, It manages to carve out its own identity. A lot of the credit for that goes to Bill Skarsgård, whose performance as Pennywise is unforgettable. Rather than borrow anything from Tim Curry, who played the role first in ABC’s two-part miniseries adaptation from 1990, Skarsgård makes the character his own, bringing a wholly alien physicality to the performance that makes one thing abundantly clear from the giddy-up: This isn’t your garden-variety sewer-dwelling murder-clown we’re dealing with here.

The look of the film also contributes to the sort of distinctive and effective personality lacking in so many of today’s horror movies. Shot on ArriRaw in a combination of 2.8K and 3.4K, the movie has a rich and gorgeous palette that makes even its most pedestrian scenes visually engaging. What’s more, you’d never know from looking at the imagery’s crisp edges, luscious textures, and fine detail that it was finished in a 2K digital intermediate. It is further proof that this sort of thing just doesn’t matter as much as some people would have you believe. The important thing is that Kaleidescape’s download is above reproach in terms of definition and detail.

HDR is also put to good use, not only in delivering the movie’s rich colors but also in allowing a good bit of extra depth in the shadows. Make no mistake about it—It is an incredibly dark film—one that should be viewed in a completely light-controlled room. But even with the lights out, the Blu-ray release made portions so inscrutably dark that it was difficult to tell what was going on at all. The 4K HDR transfer rectifies that at least enough to make even the darkest scenes discernible. Long story short, it may come from a 2K DI, but the 4K HDR release of It—at least as presented by Kaleidescape—is amazing video demo material, and comes darn close to being a reference-quality transfer. 

The Dolby TrueHD Atmos is also everything you would expect the soundtrack for a movie like this to be. Directional sound effects are aggressive as hell, the bass is absolutely britches-leg-flapping, and the overall creepy ambiance of the movie is handled fantastically by the soundtrack. My only real beef is that voices occasionally get lost in the mix. Don’t blame your center speaker if you find some of the dialogue a bit unintelligible—instead blame the sound engineers. That said, this problem isn’t nearly so bad here as it has been in the past few Chris Nolan films.

As for the movie itself, my only real beef is that it feels a little short. An odd statement to make about a 135-minute horror flick, I know, but It is so packed with characters, most of whom have their own compelling individual storylines distinct from the group dynamic, that it just whizzes by. A few extra minutes’ worth of runtime would have allowed Muschietti to flesh out a couple of characters that seem underserved here. Stanley Uris, for example—played wonderfully by the young Wyatt Oleff—serves such a minor role in the overall story that he could have just as easily been written out of the screenplay and it hardly would have been the biggest departure from the novel. The relationship between Eddie Kaspbrak and his mother is also a bit undeveloped, leaving the resolution of their storyline feeling somewhat unsatisfying.

Those quibbles aside, It is a surprisingly good horror movie that thankfully relies more on scares than gross-outs to keep you glued to the screen and huddled under your blanket. Don’t go into it expecting a faithful adaptation of Stephen King’s book (although, given how poorly that one has aged, that’s probably a good thing) but do go in expecting a very satisfying reinterpretation of parts of the novel—one that absolutely works on its own terms, whether you have any intention of watching the sequel or not.

Dennis Burger is an avid Star Wars scholar, Tolkien fanatic, and Corvette enthusiast who somehow also manages to find time for technological passions including high-end audio, home automation, and video gaming. He lives in the armpit of Alabama with his wife Bethany and their four-legged child Bruno, a 75-pound American Staffordshire Terrier who thinks he’s a Pomeranian.

PICTURE | Above reproach in terms of definition and detail, the Kaleidescape presentation of the 4K HDR release is amazing video demo material and comes darn close to being a reference-quality transfer

SOUND | Directional sound effects in the Atmos mix are aggressive as hell, the bass is absolutely pants-leg-flapping, and the overall creepy ambiance of the movie is handled fantastically

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

© 2023 Cineluxe LLC

Review: Hocus Pocus 2

Hocus Pocus 2 (2022)

review | Hocus Pocus 2

ALSO ON CINELUXE

Sign up for our monthly newsletter
to stay up to date on Cineluxe

A step up from the original, the sequel is still mainly a nostalgic sugar rush that could have been thought through a little better

by Dennis Burger
October 6, 2022

Whether or not Hocus Pocus 2 is a good movie is hardly even a coherent question. Of course it isn’t a good movie. The real question is whether or not you’ll like it, and I think the answer to that is simple. 

Are you an elder Millennial who developed a Pavlovian affection for the original through repeated exposure on The Disney Channel in the late 1990s, and you now want to try to beat a love for it into the heads of your children? Or are you in the grips of Stockholm Syndrome after being forced to become familiar with the 1993 cult classic just to understand half the memes in Memeville? If the answer to either of those questions is “yes,” I’d say there’s a 50/50 chance you’ll get something out of this Disney+ original, which at times blurs the lines between sequel, reboot, and remake. 

It’s a better movie than the original—better acted, more artfully shot, with a more coherent script and more competent direction at the hands of Anne Fletcher (Step Up, 27 Dresses) but such praise is relative. This is still a glorified after-school special with a false edge, filled with out-of-touch musical numbers and lazy references to modern culture that will lose what chuckle-worthiness they have before the inevitable Hocus Pocus 3 comes out in a few years. 

The premise of the plot is also flawed from the foundation up. It all hinges up on the fact that the Sanderson Sisters—played once again by Bette Midler, Kathy Najimy, and Sarah Jessica Parker—can only be conjured during a full moon on Halloween, and by a virgin at that. The sequel makes it quite clear that the last time the witches rampaged through Salem was in 1993, and it’s now exactly 29 years later. 

In other words, the script goes out of its way to set this sequel in 2022. And yet there’s no full moon on Halloween this year—nowhere near it. There was one in 2020 but a big whole-town Halloween celebration wouldn’t have quite made sense that year. There’ll be another one in 2039, but that wouldn’t quite work for a story whose novelty hinges upon evil women from ye olde tymes being baffled by modern technology and customs. 

Could they have just dropped the full-moon requirement and glossed it over with some retroactive continuity? Sure, that would have been the easiest way to make sense of it all. But this movie doesn’t give a hoot whether it makes sense, nor whether you care if it makes sense. It’s here to give you a nostalgic sugar rush and create an alibi for you to foist your childhood pop-culture fetish on a new generation. (And trust me: As a Star Wars devotee, I feel your pain.) 

Given that, the movie’s Dolby Vision video presentation on Disney+ almost seems wasted. The enhanced resolution is a mixed blessing as on the one hand the 8K source imagery and 4K digital intermediate allow you to appreciate some of the surprisingly nice set designs and lighting. But on the other, that resolution makes some of the constraints of the relatively meager budget a bit too apparent, especially in the compositing of some of the digital effects. 

Still, there are some details I would expect HEVC to struggle with at any bitrate, streaming or not, such as a few swirly, sparkly, extremely specular magical effects that require higher frequencies to render, all laid atop rather dark backgrounds that lean harder on the lower-frequency corner of the discrete cosine transform table. Content that demands equal reliance on high and low frequencies simultaneously is always the toughest for any hybrid block-based codec to encode and decode, and I was frankly shocked by how well Disney+ handled it. I never saw it struggle.

The Dolby Digital+ Atmos mix is best described as “perfunctory,” and if for whatever reason you plan on watching this movie in your home cinema, just know that it’s mixed about 2.5 dB below reference levels, so go ahead and turn the volume up. 

Again, though, you’d probably be better off watching Disney+’s Dolby Vision remaster of the original instead if you need to scratch this itch. It may not be as good, but at least you’re already addicted to it—otherwise, why are you even reading this?

Dennis Burger is an avid Star Wars scholar, Tolkien fanatic, and Corvette enthusiast who somehow also manages to find time for technological passions including high-end audio, home automation, and video gaming. He lives in the armpit of Alabama with his wife Bethany and their four-legged child Bruno, a 75-pound American Staffordshire Terrier who thinks he’s a Pomeranian.

PICTURE | The Dolby Vision presentation on Disney+ allows you to appreciate some of the surprisingly nice set designs and lighting, but the enhanced resolution makes some of the constraints of the relatively meager budget a bit too apparent

SOUND | The Dolby Digital+ Atmos mix is best described as “perfunctory”—it’s also mixed about 2.5 dB below reference level

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

© 2023 Cineluxe LLC

Keeping the Spies at Bay

Keeping the Spies at Bay

Keeping the Spies at Bay

People eager to dive into voice control have found their personal data being exploited and even handed over to the authorities. But there are alternatives.

by Dennis Burger
September 30, 2022

You’ve likely seen the alarming headlines about all the ways companies such as Amazon and Google share personal data from their voice-control and smart home products with law enforcement, advertisers, and other tech giants. Needless to say, most people who bought an Amazon Echo or a Google Home speaker didn’t know this sort of relinquishment of privacy was part of the bargain, and it’s probably safe to assume most of them consider it too steep a price to pay just for a bit of enhanced convenience. 

If all the above has made you hesitant to buy into a voice-control system, no one could blame you—especially if your data and your privacy are among your most valuable assets. Fortunately, Amazon and Google aren’t the only names in town when it comes to providing sophisticated voice control for things like your entertainment systems and smart home devices. Higher-end solutions exist that can do the job without intruding on your privacy. 

Probably the most enticing alternative—especially for luxury entertainment systems and high-end living spaces—is Josh AI, which offers a commitment to data privacy the mass-market solutions don’t. 

Unlike Google and Amazon, Josh AI doesn’t upload every word you utter to the cloud for processing. What you say isn’t stored on some remote server and used to triangulate your buying habits. Instead, Josh operates almost entirely inside your home on custom servers you yourself own. Very little information is sent over the internet, and you can delete your entire chat history at the touch of a button. You can also mute or turn off microphones easily.

Josh is also much more décor-friendly. Instead of tacky little fabric-covered speaker boxes, it relies on lovely and discrete microphone arrays, some designed to fit into Lutron wall plates. Josh also adapts to the way you speak instead of forcing you to learn unnatural and arcane syntax. Natural Language Processing allows for a more conversational control experience, allowing you to combine commands and create complex instructions like, “Hey Josh, dim the lights, cool the media room to 71°, lower the shades, and play the latest episode of The Rings of Power.” The system also relies on advanced AI learning to better adapt to your speech patterns and lifestyle habits over time; but if that feels too invasive, you can turn it off. 

If you want to control your premium entertainment space—and the rest of your connected home—with the power of your voice, Josh AI is more than merely a compelling alternative to invasive mass-market solutions from the likes of Amazon or Google. Not only is it purpose-designed for the task but it’s easier to integrate into high-end interiors and high-end control systems. But perhaps most importantly, it doesn’t involve selling your digital soul to the lowest bidder.

Dennis Burger is an avid Star Wars scholar, Tolkien fanatic, and Corvette enthusiast who somehow also manages to find time for technological passions including high-end audio, home automation, and video gaming. He lives in the armpit of Alabama with his wife Bethany and their four-legged child Bruno, a 75-pound American Staffordshire Terrier who thinks he’s a Pomeranian.

The Josh AI Nano voice controller incorporated into a Lutron custom wall plate

Sign up for our monthly newsletter to stay up to date on Cineluxe

© 2023 Cineluxe LLC

Review: Star Wars: Andor

Star Wars: Andor (2022)

review | Star Wars: Andor

Light on action and the slowest of slow burns, this Star Wars series still satisfies by delivering a master class in tension and suspense

by Dennis Burger
September 22, 2022

Despite its name, Star Wars: Andor is not Star Wars. And that’s totally appropriate since the movie in which the title character debuted—Rogue One: A Star Wars Story—bore only the most superficial, what-had-happened-was connection to the mythology of the galaxy far, far away to begin with. 

Here’s the difference, though. Rogue One was a cobbled together, oh-so-edgy pile of inconsequential grimdark fluff pretending to be a grownup and gritty Star Wars movie. In fact, it was reportedly barely even a coherent narrative until screenwriter Tony Gilroy was brought in to turn the footage into something resembling a movie in postproduction. 

With Andor, though, Gilroy has been working on the show since 2019, before the first frame was shot. And so, while it isn’t quite Star Wars, the series is a fascinating political drama that combines the best elements of the writer’s work on the Bourne film series (minus the action), Michael Clayton (minus the lawyers), and the neo-noir thriller Nightcrawler, which Gilroy produced for his brother Dan, who wrote and directed the film and contributes some writing to Andor.

The only real cinematic inspiration I’ve seen referenced for Andor, though, is Stanley Kramer’s 1960 adaptation of Inherit the Wind. I don’t think you’d pick up on that just from watching the show since it doesn’t seem to be narrative inspiration nor really even thematic inspiration. But as with that film, this series is, so far, a masterclass in tension and suspense. It’s the slowest of slow burns I’ve seen onscreen in ages. And yet, due to its pacing and its legitimate human drama, it doesn’t feel laborious. Each of the three episodes released thus far runs from 38 to 43 minutes and curiously manages to feel like a really satisfying and brisk two hours apiece. Watching the show is a fascinating experiment in the weird liquidity of time and our perception thereof. There isn’t a single scene in the whole affair that isn’t simultaneously gripping and deliberately measured, restrained, anticipatory.

I don’t want to gloss over something out-the-norm in that last observation, though. Unlike previous shows that carried the Star Wars branding, Andor’s first three episodes were released by Disney+ simultaneously. And in retrospect, there’s a good reason for that. The show was originally conceived as a five-season run, each season of which would jump forward a year in Cassian Andor’s life leading up to the events of Rogue One. At some point, Gilroy decided that was all just too much, and compacted each season into a mini arc. Hence, as best I understand it, the three episodes so far represent a condensation of what was originally conceived as Season One in Gilroy’s 1,500-page bible for the series, and the 12 episodes of this first of two seasons will get us about halfway through that tome. 

The consequence of that is that even if Andor goes completely off the rails as Book of Boba Fett did, or starts off with a bang and settles into predictable middlingness as Obi-Wan Kenobi did, we already have a fully fleshed-out arc with a beginning, middle, and end here, and it’s honestly the best onscreen Star Wars we’ve gotten since the last few seasons of The Clone Wars, despite hardly being Star Wars at all. 

You can probably skip this one if you’re into the franchise for its space battles, blaster fights, lightsabers, and space wizards. I love all of that stuff but there’s none of it to be found here (except for one action set-piece in Episode Three where shots are fired, but that ends up being almost more of an environmental ballet than an O.K. Corral homage). 

You can probably also skip the show if you’re looking for home theater demo material. Andor is a very bruised-looking work, high on contrast and largely devoid of dynamic range. Its Dolby Vision encoding mostly serves to keep details from being lost in the shadows. It’s gorgeous but never eye-popping. There’s more texture here than detail, more tonal richness than gamut-stressing intensity. And while the Dolby Atmos mix is simultaneously expansive and enveloping when called for, it’s predominantly a talky affair. Most of the channels aside from the center are filled with falling rain and the haunting, moody, brilliant-but-subdued score by Nicholas Britell (The Big Short). 

It’s odd. I went into Andor feeling almost obliged to watch it, given how little interest I have in the film that inspired it and the character at its heart but how much devotion I have to this franchise nonetheless. Now I find myself eagerly awaiting the next episode in a way that exceeds my anticipation for the next season of The Mandalorian. But with this one, I’m not watching it because it’s Star Wars. I’m watching it because, at least so far, it’s simply damned good cinema in an episodic-TV package.

Dennis Burger is an avid Star Wars scholar, Tolkien fanatic, and Corvette enthusiast who somehow also manages to find time for technological passions including high-end audio, home automation, and video gaming. He lives in the armpit of Alabama with his wife Bethany and their four-legged child Bruno, a 75-pound American Staffordshire Terrier who thinks he’s a Pomeranian.

PICTURE | The Dolby Vision presentation mostly serves to keep details from being lost in the shadows. It’s gorgeous but never eye-popping. 

SOUND | While the Atmos mix is simultaneously expansive and enveloping when called for, it’s predominantly a talky affair

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

© 2023 Cineluxe LLC

Scroll to top

sign up for our newsletter

receive a monthly recap of everything that’s new on Cineluxe